Evansville Water: The Movie: Part 1

Audio/Video Evansville Schools Meetings

Seek the High Ground

The Book of Minutes

Search This Blog

Wisconsin Wit

Sunday, August 13, 2006

Re: "Fred" speaks on E85----Comparing Apples to Apples

(Ed. Note: This was a comment from another post that I have posted for better visability.)



Fred Juergens <FredJuergens@Charter.net> wrote:
Fred Juergens has left a new comment on your post ""Walton" Speaks on "Building a Bandwagon."":

Part of this comment is also posted on "Walton", but may get more attention here......

One fact that never, well hardly ever, shows up in the E85 discourse is that mileage with E85 is substantially lower than with gasoline. Any chemist can tell you there's just not as much energy in a gallon of E85 as there is in a gallon of gas, and that is never going to change -- it's just the nature of the materials.

A month or so ago, the NYTimes had an article elaborating on this point. I'll just cite one example of a vehicle which can run on both fuels:

According to the EPA, 2006 Dodge Ram 1500 pickup burning gasoline gets 12 mpg in city and 15 on highway. Burning E85, the same vehicle gets 9 mpg in city and 11 on highway.

E85 will have to be about 25% cheaper than gasoline, according to these figures, in order for the cost-per-mile of using E85 to be the same as gasoline.

In contrast, petroleum-based diesel fuel has about 10% MORE energy/gallon than gasoline. I'm frankly not sure about bio-diesel made from soy oil specifically, but bio-diesel in general has about the SAME energy/gallon as gasoline.

I suggest that these are all points to ponder as governments at all levels work toward "energy independence". There's political controversy right now about an E85 pump in Monroe, I believe, having the right to sell its product at about $2.15/gallon, or whether it should be sold at the same price as petroleum-based gasoline.

Publish this comment.

Reject this comment.

Moderate comments for this blog.

Posted by Fred Juergens to Evansville Observer at 8/13/2006 11:40:36 AM

Saturday, August 12, 2006

"Fred" Does some Math with Population Trends-----

"Fred" reviews the math on population increases in Evansville----Enjoy.

Mercury Corner: Yahoo news covers the results of Mercury 2006 Conference in Madison

Evansville's own Mr. Jim Hurley is mentioned in this article from Yahoo via Reuters on the results of the Mercury conference. Some progress on the disposal of mercury laden switches from autos. Enjoy.

Re: Evansville's Population



William Connors <weconnors07@yahoo.com> wrote:
The state Department of Administration just released
its preliminary population estimates as of January 1,
2006. According to this state department, the City of
Evansville's population at the beginning of this year
was 4,896, up 236 from the estimate of 4,660 as of
January 1, 2005. If memory serves, the city's
estimated population increased by about 250 from
January 1, 2004, to January 1, 2005. The city's
population has increased by 857, or 21.22%, from the
January 1, 2000, census population of 4,039. No other
city, village, or town in Rock County has experienced
anywhere close to that much population growth since
January 1, 2000. Evanville's population growth rate
is similar to the rate being experienced by Sun
Prairie and Waunakee in Dane County (but less than
Verona's growth rate).

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com

The Shock

One of my favorite sayings of Don Sheehan, was that there were basically just three kinds of people: Those who make change, those who respond to change, and those who are dimly aware that anything has happened.

O.K. that was oversimplified. But nevertheless, change can be a shock. Years ago I planted some 12 arbor vitae trees during the week that my oldest daughter graduated from Evansville High School, and they were 1 foot tall. As I gazed out the window at them the other day, which is the picture on the blog, I realized that if they were now 12 feet tall, I must have aged too. O.K. That was a shock.

The other night at the Evansville Common Council, Mr. Michael Pierick made a statement that was startling for some: He said, " Even if development is held to the levels outlined in the Smart Growth Plan, the District will probably outgrow one or more of its buildings before the high school payments are complete."

It has been assumed by many that the Smart Growth Plan assumed, even without any impact analysis done, that somehow magically even though we build it and people come, no additional expense would be required for our schools prior to the current bonds being paid off. Now the shock. This is not so.

This week, the consultants, Plunkett Raysich, went on a walk thru of the Middle School. On Monday night, at the Evansville School Board, there may be some general remarks on what they found. I hope to have the audio for residents who cannot attend this meeting.

It is important to read Mr. Pierick's speech and listen to it---This is like making Blueberry Ice Cream. He explains that analogy in his speech. This is all about responding to change and about being realistic about the impact of development. The input of the community will be important in this response. So---stay tuned.

"Walton" Speaks on "Building a Bandwagon."

Click on the post for some reasons from "Walton" why E85 matters---especially here and especially now. Thanks, Walton.

Friday, August 11, 2006

Evansville Park Board Announces Public Hearing on Five Year Plan--8-22-2006--6PM

CITY OF EVANSVILLE

Notice of Public Hearing

Park and Recreation Board Regular Meeting

Tuesday, August 22, 2006 6:00 PM

City Hall, 31 S. Madison Street, Evansville, WI

The Park and Recreation Board will hold a public hearing on a new Five-year Park and Outdoor Recreation Plan, which would replace the 1999 Plan. The new Plan will guide the development and improvement of the City’s outdoor recreation facilities over the next five years, in order to meet the recreational needs and demands of the city’s residents. Park and Recreation Board will draw on Evansville's 2005 Smart Growth Plan, as far as the Smart Growth Plan applies to parks and outdoor recreation. Park and Recreation Board also wishes to learn what residents think now of the current park facilities and programs and to determine their desires for the future. The purpose of the public hearing is for the PRB to receive citizen input on these questions:

What are the strengths & weaknesses of Evansville’s park facilities and current park programs?
What changes would you like to see in these facilities and programs over the next five years?
All interested persons are invited to attend.

James Beilke, Clerk/Treasurer

Agenda: Rededevlopment Authority; August 15, 2006

NOTICE

The regular meeting of the Evansville Redevelopment Authority for the City of Evansville will be held on the 15th day of August, 2006, at 7:30 p.m., at City Hall, 31 South Madison Street, Evansville, Wisconsin. Notice is further given that members of the City Council might be in attendance.

Evansville Redevelopment Authority

Regular Meeting

Tuesday, August 15, 2006, 7:30 PM
City Hall, 31 S. Madison Street, Evansville, Wisconsin

AGENDA

Call To Order
Declare Quorum
Approve Agenda
Approve Minutes of July 18, 2006, meeting
Old Business
Discussion of vacancy on Board
New business
Jan Davis’ applications for assistance for façade renovation
Other business
Adjourn
Christopher A. Eager, Chairman

Gazette Corner: On The Economic Impact Possibilities of Biodiesel

Gina Duwe has written on the possible economic impacts on Evansville from the biodiesel.

"Grumps" is on point. Connects some dots

"Grumps" connects some of the "dots" that make up the biodiesel picture.

Thursday, August 10, 2006

Gazette Corner: Looks good for biodiesel in Evansville

click on the post for the latest in the Janesville Gazette.

Barricades Go Up Sept 4th--Detour Route Set for Thru Traffic---Local Traffic Will Continue

At the Principal's meeting this morn at City Hall, the City, it's engineers, the contractors and involved city departments met to discuss the plan for the Madison, Main Street intersection renovation. It will all begin on Sept 4th with the barricades. Actual work will begin on Sept 7th.

The "thru traffic" will be routed Hwy 14, to Exchange St, to Water Street.

"Local" traffic, where that is defined as a car with a destination in the construction zone, will continue as today. Thus, that "local" car could be a person who is from out of town, who decides to go to a coffee shop or pharmacy downtown. There will be access to businesses at all times.

As in the previous Hwy 14 project, the resident engineer will be Tom Pfefferkorn, who will be distributing a flyer to residents updating them on progress and things to watch for.

The hours of operation for construction will be 7am to 3:30PM ++. The major point is that it will not begin before 7am. There will be no nightime construction. This was discussed and ruled out as not desirable.

During the Construction season--which should be substantially done by November 3rd----The Observer will be standing by, in the event of any press release from the city and will promptly post any notices for Observer readers.

Stay Tuned.

"Fred" comments on last Tuesday's Council Vote

Click on the post for "Fred's" thoughts on last Tuesday.

"Let's Just Elope"; Or, what's new in biodiesel land?

Recently one of our couple friends had a daughter that was getting married. Flush with excitement over the engagement, they began to talk of the marriage details.

Soon, after the discussions had ensued with all the family members----the excitement began to be replaced with anxiety. Yes. Just pure stress over the rising dollar amounts required in modern society just to maintain one's self esteem in the land of uptempo society.

Then the couple had a moment of quiet discussion. A closed session so to speak.

Then they announced that they were eloping to Mexico and would be married in a quiet ceremony there. If the parents and friends wanted to join them they were welcome.

Suddenly everyone relaxed.

Now it was a getaway. What fun! No problem.

-----------------------------------------------------

The other night, a local pundit, as if to test The Observer, asked what I thought was going on with the biodiesel plant negotiations.

I pled ignorance.

Then, however, I did mention that this was a little like a wedding reception----where the bride and groom are NOT allowed to elope. Where the city as the party planner has to do its best to get all the details right. Right for the city, right for the parties, right for the taxpayer.

Yes, it's very much like making everyone happy in the wedding preparation business.

Everyone would like to elope. But alas----- that is not possible.

So. The Observer is just patient. I will just wait for the press releases knowing that these are difficult things to negotiate. "Chill" is the word. That's how I see it.

Dateline St. Paul: The "Scattered TIF"

(Ed.note. This article is appearing today in the Midway Como Monitor, and I wish to thank my brother, Denis, for allowing me to publish it. Two TIF's, different locations, one losing money and the other profitable. They are called "Scattered."
As a personal note, I used to run along this corridor each morning on the way to the bus stop to college. Enjoy. )


Lexington Park’s final two pieces falling into place



By JANE MCCLURE
Lexington Park’s final two pieces are falling into place, with housing
likely on most if not all of the southern part of the property at the
southwest corner of Lexington Parkway and University Avenue. The St. Paul
City Council took two actions related to the project July 26.
A preliminary development agreement was approved for Lexington Park and for
another Wellington Management project, 2700 University Av. A final agreement
will be brought back to the City Council, acting as the Housing and
Redevelopment Authority (HRA), at a later date.

Wellington would like the city to put the two properties in what is called a
“scattered site” tax increment financing (TIF) district. “It’s a complicated
project,” said St. Paul Planning and Economic Development (PED) Director
Cecile Bedor.
The proposed TIF district would be a factor in the completion of
Wellington’s two University Avenue projects, Emerald Gardens near University
and Highway 280, and Lexington Park at Lexington and University. It could
mean a total commitment of TIF and gap financing dollars of $3.5 million for
the two projects.

The Lexington Park site wouldn’t generate sufficient TIF revenues to defray
its redevelopment expenses. Creating the scattered-site TIF district would
allow 2700 University to contribute $541,000 in tax increment to Lexington
Park. But that would still leave a gap of about $475,000.
PED staff will seek a Metropolitan Council Livable Communities grant of
$503,000, which would be used to fund an east-west street and sidewalks
through Lexington Park’s south end. If the grant doesn’t come through the
city would have to pay for that part of the project.

Although City Council members agreed to allow PED staff to negotiate the
agreement and bring it back for final approval at a later date, some
questioned conditions of the proposed agreement. Council members raised
questions about everything from allowing the PED Director to approve which
grocery store goes in at Emerald Gardens to what kind of pre-commitment is
being made at Lexington Park.

Others wonder about the use of TIF, which allows a developer to capture
increased property taxes realized through development and apply those values
to specific development-related expenses.
“I’m continuing to grow very uncomfortable with our TIF strategy," said Ward
Five Council Member Lee Helgen. He believes the city is being too
speculative with some projects.

Three Council Member Pat Harris said he has a problem with directing TIF
money from one site to another, and not having it available to other
projects.

But PED staff noted that the study of housing at Lexington Park will
determine whether that phase of the project should go forward. “It may be
determined that housing at Lexington Park doesn’t make sense,” said Bob
Geurs.
Tony Schertler reminded the HRA Board that when the Lexington Park
development process began a few years ago, Wellington wanted to put the
entire concern in a TIF district. Staff felt the proposed city subsidy was
too high, and most of the project site was developed piece by piece, without
TIF help.
Wellington recently demolished the Colonial Building at 2700 University Av.
to make way for an 85-unit condominium building with 128,000 square feet of
commercial space as well as structured parking. Despite earlier rumors that
popular specialty grocer Trader Joe’s was eyeing that location, Riverside
Market has been identified as the grocery store for the site. The
condominiums will be market-rate, with a price range of $65,000 to $325,000.
If initial sales go well, another 12 condominium units would be added.
Wellington is seeking $1.5 million in tax increment financing assistance for
the structured parking and building demolition expenses at 2700 University
Av. That is if the grocery store is part of the project. If not, the TIF
amount is $1.2 million.

At Lexington and University, community members are pressing for market-rate
housing to be built at the southeast corner of the development site.
Wellington has agreed to spend $200,000 for a feasibility study to determine
whether the condos should be built.
Tentatively proposed is a two-phase project, with 40 units of condos,
underground parking and 7,000 square feet of street-level commercial space.
Units would sell for $140,000 to $198,000. TIF and gap financing assistance
needed is estimated at $2 million.
The second phase at Lexington Park would be 39 condos with underground
parking. HRA staff recommend not proceeding with this phase of the project
until the first phase is completed. The financing gap for this part of then
project is estimated at $2.12 million.

Wellington Management head Steve Wellington has indicated that market-rate
housing may not be feasible at Lexington Park, but that his company is
interested and is willing to explore the idea. During the years of debate
over redevelopment at Lexington and University, many community groups have
pushed for housing to be built there, citing its proximity to the proposed
Central Corridor transit project.

At recent meetings of the Lexington Park Design Advisory group,
representatives of area district councils and community groups have pushed
very hard for market-rate housing. But a softening housing market could be
factor in what is ultimately built there.
Much less controversial was the City Council’s decision July 26 to rezone
property at the southwest corner of Lexington Park for the Episcopal Homes
project. The property will be rezoned from general business to multi-family
residential to allow the construction of a 50-unit low-income senior housing
building, Carty Homes. The St. Paul Planning Commission and
Lexington-Hamline Community Council recommended approval of the rezoning
request. Construction of the building will start in the fall.

Re: Mailbag: Mark Writes; On 27%

(Ed.note. This was a comment on another post but I have posted it for better visability.)



Mark Schnepper <mschnepper@yahoo.com> wrote:
Mark Schnepper has left a new comment on your post "Current Observer Poll Status:":

My suspicions were completely correct in regard to the "magic number" of 27%. This was completely an arbitary number that was based on how people felt as far as future growth compared to past growth (in other words, keep it the same or less). It has no basis in the reality of how it will impact the city or what would be an optimal growth rate.

I was told by a local developer at a "town hall" meeting that Mayor Ringhand held a year ago, that the schools needed this type of growth to pay off the the school bonds because they are "backloaded." I have voiced my opinion on this subject many times, because I feel that too much growth will cause the need for new school facilities before the bonds that built the high school are paid in full. Michael Pierick confirmed that suspicion last evening stating that it is expected that we will need new facilities 6 years prior to paying off those bonds.

Thank you to all of the council members for listening to the will of the community. In my opinion, if any amendment is necessary, it would be one to slow growth, not accelerate it. However, I think we are pretty well tied to the 27% growth rate with the agreements that are in place.

Publish this comment.



Posted by Mark Schnepper to
Evansville Observer at 8/09/2006 10:39:45 PM

Wednesday, August 09, 2006

DeJa Vu---What happened to the checklists? What happened to Ordinance 2005-27?

Tuesday, August 02, 2005
Evansville Plan Commission approves Ordinance 2005--27---Establishes Checklist Criteria and Process for new Development

In a response to discussions about the planning process during the June Comprehensive Plan meeting, the Evansville Planning Commission on Monday, Aug 1, 2005 approved Ordinance 2005-27 which provides an application process providing more structured review of how a new development proposal would imact the city in defined impact areas. The key area of the ordinance is section 9(f) which provides for the review criteria.

The very first review criteria is the "Effects on local services, including: public road system, police and fire protection, utilities, and public schools. " Other effects to be analyzed are effects on the environment, public health and safety and wildlife.

The city would conduct the impact study using staff and using some software available. It is unclear whether developers would be assessed a fee for this impact study.

The ordinance also provides for public input via a public hearing after a preliminary application for plat approval.

The positive for developers seems to be a more defined process where after an application is made, they are informed as to what is specifically required and in what time frame.

posted by Evansville Observer @ 6:34 AM 0 comme






--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



. -->

Mailbag: Michael Moore Writes:

Friends,

Let the resounding defeat of Senator Joe Lieberman send a cold shiver down the spine of every Democrat who supported the invasion of Iraq and who continues to support, in any way, this senseless, immoral, unwinnable war. Make no mistake about it: We, the majority of Americans, want this war ended -- and we will actively work to defeat each and every one of you who does not support an immediate end to this war.

Nearly every Democrat set to run for president in 2008 is responsible for this war. They voted for it or they supported it. That single, stupid decision has cost us 2,592 American lives and tens of thousands of Iraqi lives. Lieberman and Company made a colossal mistake -- and we are going to make sure they pay for that mistake. Payback time started last night.

I realize that there are those like Kerry and Edwards who have now changed their position and are strongly anti-war. Perhaps that switch will be enough for some to support them. For others, like me -- while I'm glad they've seen the light -- their massive error in judgment is, sadly, proof that they are not fit for the job. They sided with Bush, and for that, they may never enter the promised land.

To Hillary, our first best hope for a woman to become president, I cannot for the life of me figure out why you continue to support Bush and his war. I'm sure someone has advised you that a woman can't be elected unless she proves she can kick ass just as crazy as any man. I'm here to tell you that you will never make it through the Democratic primaries unless you start now by strongly opposing the war. It is your only hope. You and Joe have been Bush's biggest Democratic supporters of the war. Last night's voter revolt took place just a few miles from your home in Chappaqua. Did you hear the noise? Can you read the writing on the wall?

To every Democratic Senator and Congressman who continues to back Bush's War, allow me to inform you that your days in elective office are now numbered. Myself and tens of millions of citizens are going to work hard to actively remove you from any position of power.

If you don't believe us, give Joe a call.

Yours,
Michael Moore
mmflint@aol.com
www.michaelmoore.com

P.S. Republicans -- sorry to leave you out of this letter. It's just that our side has a little housecleaning to do. We'll take care of you this November.

"Grumps" has the scoop on the "crushing plant" report

Click on the post for the details on the Soybean Assn report.

"Yike"----a true story

Monday night I had forgotten a key ingredient for grilling, so I rushed back to the Pig to get it.

In the checkout line just behind me was a young father and his son, about 4yr.old. As I was writing out the check, I heard the boy ask, "What's this dad?" His dad replied, "That's a peanut bar."

"I yike peanuts, Dad! I really yike them. Can I have one?"

"NO, son, the father replied."

Then the son said, "What's this dad?"

"That's a choclate bar."

"I yike choclate! I really, really yike chocolate. Oh can't I have one?"

"No son," he said firmly, but gently.

I was tempted, as I was possibly the only phonics trained person in the checkout line, to take a moment and go over how to pronounce the "l" sound, with the tounge pressed to the top of the mouth. It was easy to master and I know I could have changed the "yike" in short order.

On reflection, I realized how lucky this youngster was to have such a fine dad and that what was being taught here was far more than just a little consonant sound. That could be dealt with later.

Yes. The more I listened to the young boy say "I yike peanuts dad," the more I was getting the idea that maybe I needed one too. I too have always yiked them.

But the triumph was I got out of there without a chocolate or peanute bar. Alleluia.

Gazette Corner: Gina Duwe has the scoop on last nights Evansville Common Council Vote: On the analogies and more

Gina covers the analogies used to say "no" at last night's Evansville Council Meeting. Enjoy.

Victor Paulson Remembers: The Early Movies--1915-1930

(Ed. note. Victor Paulson,95, is a longtime resident of Evansville. In this post he shares his memory about the early movies, and his first silent, "Birth of A Nation." This silent movie was released in 1915 and was based on the novel, "The Clansman" by Thomas Dixon. The book "The Clansman" was originally a propaganda piece for the KKK. The movie provoked riots in its day, and has provoked controversy ever since. Click on the post for a history of the movie. )


this is an audio post - click to play

this is an audio post - click to play

Victor Paulson Remembers: Health Care and Schools---1920-1930

(Victor Paulson,95, is a longtime resident of Evanvsville, and has shared his knowledge of the health care and education in the good old days, 1920-1930.)


this is an audio post - click to play

"Walton" Speaks on the "Minimum Markup Law" on gasoline in Wisconsin

Click on the post for a reflection by "Walton" on the minimum markup law.

Last night at a meeting, I heard one sage say, "I have no problem with the concept of a minimum markup law, but just with the way it is calculated."

Is this so? Does the law just need revision to adjust to modern realities, or does the law need to be scrapped?

The Observer is all ears. You make the call.

Tuesday, August 08, 2006

Evansville Common Council Votes NO to Smart Growth Amendment that would accelerate growth

After waiting two hours for Council members to convene in closed session regarding TIF #6, and dispose of other issues, the Evansville Common Council discussed the proposal of John Mourning to move property of Mr. Mass from the long range planning designation to the interim map with the prospect of adding at least 100 lots to consist of a "walkable neighborhood" development, which would include some "node" of commercial development.

Eleven citizens spoke on the proposal, and all were against. Mr. Michael Pierick, citizen and also president of the Evansville School Board, spoke as a private citizen, and reviewed the impact the current population growth for Evansville Schools, much less any consideration of added development beyond the Smart Growth Plan projection. The thrust of his remarks were that the Smart Growth population growth is going to provide big challenges to our school system, and to add any more development without thought of its impact would be irresponsible and harmful to our community, and specifically to our school system and the taxpayers that support it.

Council members voted 0-8 to say NO to the proposal.

Whatever the views of council members before the meeting, it was clear that the council responded to the community wish as expressed in the originial Smart Growth Survey as well as the views of citizens who appeared at the hearing.

Stay tuned. The Observer will have audioblogger and also some text of remarks of the meeting.

Audioblogger: Mr. Michael Pierick Speaks on Move to Bust Smart Growth Plan: On Impact on Schools; On Blueberry Ice Cream

this is an audio post - click to play

"Grumps" Speaks on Smart Growth Amendment Proposal

this is an audio post - click to play

Matt Gaboda, Westside resident Speaks on Council Proposal to accelerate Smart Growth Plan

this is an audio post - click to play

Fred Juergens Speaks: On representing the Public Interest; Speaks prior to Council Vote on Mass Property Proposal

this is an audio post - click to play

The Honor of Your Attendence is Requested........TONIGHT

The Honor of Your attendence is requested at the meeting of the Evansville Common Council TONIGHT Tuesday, August 8th, 6:30PM at City Hall as it holds an open public hearing on the question of whether to amend the Smart Growth Plan adopted on June 15, 2005 and move property targeted for development ten years from now to the intermediate land use plan and thus to be annexed at developer request.

This plan amendment is not an academic matter. It will create the potential to accelerate growth from the targeted 27% that was the identified by the Evansville Community Survey done in 2004, and which reflects the will of 95% of the citizens of Evansville. This figure of 95% is also the amount of folks voting against the plan amendment on the Evansville Observer web site.

Any acceleration of the growth rate has the danger of adding significantly to the property tax burden of Evansville residents. Much of the school debt issued to finance the school improvements of 2002 is "back loaded" debt, meaning that it will increase over time. It will really increase over time if we accelerate our growth since we would incur new debt in building new schools to meet the student demand created by new construction.

Evansville citizens voted in the community survey. They have voted on the Observer survey. Now YOU need to vote by your feet---by physically being present at the Common Council meeting on Tuesday, August 8th, 6:30PM and say that magic word -------NO. Insist that that our public servants be just that. Insist that our common council members actually represent the citizens.

Be there.

Re: New comment on Agenda: Common Council: Tuesday, August 8, 2006; 6:30PM



Le Penseur <noreply-comment@blogger.com> wrote:
Le Penseur has left a new comment on your post "Agenda: Common Council: Tuesday, August 8, 2006; 6:30PM":

If you cannot make it tonight:

Sandy Decker, Mayor voted "YES" @ PC
143 W. Main St.
Evansville, WI 53536
608-882-5528
sandy.decker@ci.evansville.wi.gov

Mason Braunschweig, Voted "NO" @ PC
Ald., 1st District
590 W. Main St.
Evansville, WI 53536
608-882-0711
masonbraunschweig@hotmail.com

Bill Hammann Voted "NO" @ PC
Ald., 1st District
250 Eager Ct.
Evansville, WI 53536
608-882-9993
bhammann@charter.net

Fred Juergens
Ald., 2nd District
401 Badger Dr.
Evansville, WI 53536
608-882-2489
FredJuergens@charter.net

Thomas Cothard
Ald., 2nd District
447 Evans Dr.
Evansville, WI 53536
608-882-5709

Tony Wyse
Ald., 3rd District
Box 106, 112 Grove St .
Evansville, WI 53536
608-882-4144
team5motorsports@hotmail.com

Diane Roberts
Ald., 3rd District
145 Countryside Dr.
Evansville, WI 53536
608-882-6255

John Sornson
Ald., 4th District
249 Franklin St.
Evansville, WI 53536
608-882-4647

Dennis Wessels
Ald., 4th District
257 Franklin St.
Evansville, WI 53536
608-882-6308
wessels@ticon.net

Publish this comment.

Reject this comment.

Moderate comments for this blog.

Posted by Le Penseur to Evansville Observer at 8/08/2006 07:43:32 AM

Monday, August 07, 2006

Agenda: Common Council: Tuesday, August 8, 2006; 6:30PM

Common Council

Regular Meeting

Tuesday, August 8, 2006, 6:30 p.m.

City Hall, 31 S. Madison Street, Evansville, WI

AGENDA

Call to order
Roll call
Approval of Agenda
Motion to waive the reading of the minutes of July 11, 2006, regular meeting and approve them as printed
Report of Representative Brett Davis on status of Main Street Department of Transportation Enhancement Grant Application
Upon the proper motion and approval vote, the Common Council will convene into closed session pursuant to Sec. 19.85(1)(e) Wisconsin Statutes for deliberation or negotiation of public funds for potential commercial/industrial development
Reconvene to open session
TID 6 - possible action to establish suitable use designation
Possible action authorizing the City and/or City Staff to initiate proceedings to amend the official map and/or the zoning classification of the property of D & D Properties
Citizen appearances
Reports of Committees
Evansville Community Partnership
S.O.L.E. Committee
Dean Community Center Advisory Committee (youth program operated by the Janesville YMCA)
Plan Commission Report
Second reading and motion to adopt Ordinance #2006-16, amending the Municipal Code relative to window signs
Motion to approve the division of a two-lot division off of Exchange Street as shown on the preliminary CSM, provided the conditions listed in the staff report (and other conditions as may be imposed by the Commission) are met prior to recording the final CSM with Rock County
Motion to approve the division of a two-lot division off of Brown School Road as shown on the preliminary CSM, provided the conditions listed in the staff report (and other conditions as may be imposed by the Commission) are met prior to recording the final CSM with Rock County
Motion to approve the division of a two-lot division off of West Main Street Road as shown on the preliminary CSM, provided the conditions listed in the staff report (and other conditions as may be imposed by the Commission) are met prior to recording the final CSM with Rock County (Plan Commission recommended denial)
Update of status of Intergovernmental Committee
Amendment to the City’s Smart Growth Comprehensive Plan
Staff Report
Initial discussion by Council
Public hearing
Final discussion by Council
Second reading and motion to adopt Ordinance #2006-20, amending the interim future land use map contained in the City’s Comprehensive Plan in response to development application 2006-15
Amendment to the City’s Smart Growth Comprehensive Plan
Staff Report
Initial discussion by Council
Public hearing
Final discussion by Council
Second reading and motion to adopt Ordinance #2006-21, amending the interim future land use map contained in the City’s Comprehensive Plan in response to development application 2006-16
Amendment to the City’s Smart Growth Comprehensive Plan
Staff Report
Initial discussion by Council
Public hearing
Final discussion by Council
Second reading and motion to adopt Ordinance #2006-22, amending the interim future land use map and future land use map contained in the City’s Comprehensive Plan in response to development application 2006-21
Amendment to the City’s Smart Growth Comprehensive Plan
Staff Report
Initial discussion by Council
Public hearing
Final discussion by Council
Second reading and motion to adopt Ordinance #2006-23, amending the interim future land use map and future land use map contained in the City’s Comprehensive Plan in response to development application 2006-22
Amendment to the City’s Smart Growth Comprehensive Plan
Staff Report
Initial discussion by Council
Public hearing
Final discussion by Council
Second reading and motion to adopt Ordinance #2006-24, amending the future land use map contained in the City’s Comprehensive Plan in response to development application 2006-23
Finance and Labor Relations Committee Report
Motion to approve W&L bills and authorize their payment
Motion to approve the City bills and authorize their payment
Motion adopt Resolution #2006-8, amending the adopted 2006 city budget to increase the appropriation for the youth center for equipment (Tabled last month)
Motion to approve proposal for professional services to revise TID No. 6 for suitable use designation
Motion to approve proposal for professional services to create TID No. 7
Motion to approve City Attorney and City Engineer expense for preparation of future Department of Transportation and Department of Commerce grant applications
Motion to approve Resolution #2006-25, amending the adopted 2006 city budget to fund the construction of a restroom/shelter structure and addition of playground equipment at Countryside Park beginning in September 2006
Motion to approve Resolution #2006-31, amending the adopted 2006 city budget to increase the appropriation for 10-5114-740, Tax Refunds
Motion to approve Resolution #2006-33, amending the Adopted 2006 City Budget to Increase the Appropriation for the Pool/Park Store Maintenance Expenses
Motion to contact Public Administration Associates, LLC (PPA) for their service to find candidates for the city administrator position
Discussion regarding temporary budget preparation assistance
Status of Mezera federal lawsuit
Public Safety Committee Report
Public Works Committee Report
Motion to approve Resolution #2006-35, documenting review of the completed Compliance Maintenance Annual Report (CMAR) and indicating action to be taken to prevent effluent limit violations
Motion to approve R & K & Sons Construction’s bid for West Side Park Grading and Seeding project
Motion to approve Krause Konstruction Company’s bid for City Hall Roof Replacement and Exterior Upgrades
Water & Light Committee Report
Motion to approve Water Rate Case application to the Public Service Commission of Wisconsin (PSCW) to increase water rates
Economic Development Committee Report
Evansville Redevelopment Authority Report
Parks and Recreation Board Report
Historic Preservation Commission Report
Fire District Report
Unfinished Business
Communications and Recommendations from the Mayor
Motion to approve Resolution #2006-32, commending William Connors for his years of service as the administrator for the City of Evansville


New Business
Introduction of New Ordinances
First reading of Ordinance #2006-26, amending stop sign locations [sponsored by Ald. Sornson and Ald. Hammann]
First reading of Ordinance #2006-27, amending the Municipal Code by specifying that land uses not listed in Article V of the Zoning Code are prohibited [sponsored by Ald. Braunschweig and Ald. Hammann]
First reading of Ordinance #2006-28, amending the future transportation map contained in the City’s comprehensive plan in response to application 2006-27 [This is an applicant-initiated ordinance]
First reading of Ordinance #2006-29, rezoning territory from Agricultural District One (A-1) to Regional Business District (B-4) [This is an applicant-initiated ordinance]
Motion to adjourn
Sandra J. Decker, Mayor

Gazette Corner: Brodhead allows billboard advertising in football stadium. Will Evansville follow?

Click on the post for the article in the Janesville Gazette by Gina Duwe. What do you think? Should Evansville follow this example?

You make the call.

Mercury Corner: Big Wis. Mercury Emitter Offers to cut emission to ZERO---

A major polluter of mercury in Wisconsin has offered to invest 50 million and cut mercury emissions to ZERO if electricity costs can be cut.

Click on the post for the full story.

George Goggleye, Chief, Leach Lake Band of Ojibwe --"Mercury Impacts on Midwest Tribes"

this is an audio post - click to play

this is an audio post - click to play

this is an audio post - click to play

Russ Feingold Speaks----"Perpectives on Mercury"; Intro. by Jim Hurley Co-Chair-Intl. Mercury Conference

(Ed. note. Click on the post for the Mercury Conference website and the four main plenary issues that will be discussed and the members of each issue team.)

this is an audio post - click to play

this is an audio post - click to play

The Presentation of the Flags: International Mercury Conference: Evansville Students Featured



(Listen as Jim Hurley announces the Presentation of the flags at the 2006 International Mercury Conference which featured Evanville students carrying the flags of the many nations.)

this is an audio post - click to play

Mole Lake Singers: Prayer for Mercury Conference Success: Band of Lake Superior Chippewa

( Ed. note. In this audio, a tribal leader of the Chippewa says that the prayer chanted tells of a dream after WWI that all nations would live in peace and be gathered together in good health. He speaks of the honor to be there watching the children representing all the nations as the ceremony opened.

As a sidenote---the Observer was seated midst some younger Evansville boys, and if one of the Native drummers had hinted of fainting or illness.....they were ready and in the beat to step forward. The future of percussion in Evansville is in good hands. Relax. )

this is an audio post - click to play

Jim Hurley, Sen Russ Feingold, Evansville Kids, Parents Kickoff 2006 International Mercury Conference at Monona Terrace--69 Nations Present

(Ed.note. Thanks to Steve Carlson for the photos. Also to Gina Duwe of the Janesville Gazette for the background article--click on the post--on the art project Evansville students participated in for this conference.)



In an impressive and dramatic opening ceremony Sunday afternoon at 5PM at Monona Terrace, dozens of Evanville students and parents kicked off the week of scientific and political discussions about Mercury as a global pollutant.

If you click on the audioblogger, you will hear the opening brass music as Evansville students carried the 69 flags representing the 69 nations that were present. In addition, the Leech Lake Indian nation was present and their chief spoke and they shared a tribal prayer for the success of the conference.

If you click on the post, you can read the story in the Janesville Gazette by Gina Duwe about the art project that Evansville Students participated in. Of all the art that was produced by the seven nations participating, 7 T-shirts were selected and each of the studens marching with a flag had on one of the distinctive T-shirts. They were also for sale.

In his opening remarks, as co-chair of this international event, Mr. Jim Hurley noted that it was fitting that the kickoff to this event was marked by the involvement of children around the globe since the impact of mercury as a pollutant was directly on our children and their children to come. It is important that we and they understand what is at stake.

Dr. Komyo Eto, of the National Institute for Minamata Disease spoke about the terrible impact of mercury poisoning on the people of Minamata, Japan. For the past 50 years the people of Minamata have been dying and been seriously ill due to corporate dumping of mercury in the Minamata bay. This type of poisoning has been called "Minamata disease" because this was the first time it was identified as being caused by mercury.

George Goggleye, Chair of the Leech Lake Band of Ojibwe spoke about the terrible impact of mercury poisoning on the Indian nation in northern Minnesota. Because of the "spot" pollution of mercury which is more intense than the average. The impact on IQ loss for children born in the areas affected is 7 points on average. The rough estimate of damages of loss per person was $87,000 per person.

Then Sen. Russ Feingold spoke about why the current administration and the EPA rules on mercury pollution were undermining the Clean Air Act. He deplored the Republican Party stance on this issue which would accept the damage to children which was estimated at 8 billion per year, rather than embrace the technology that was available and indeed affordable for roughly the same amount of money.

Sunday, August 06, 2006

Minutes: Public Works: July 20, 2006

Public Works Committee Meeting Minutes
  Posted by Picasa
Regular Meeting

Thursday, July 20, 2006, 6:00 p.m.

City Hall, 31 S. Madison St., Evansville, WI

Call the meeting to order @ 6:00 PM.
Roll Call: Ald. Hammann (Chair) & Ald. Sornson , Ald. Juergens. Staff: Dave Wartenweiler, Public Works Director. Absent: Dave Sauer, City Engineer & Bruce Woods, Street Architect. Quorum attained.
Minutes of June meeting unanimously approved on a Hammann-Sornson motion.
Approval of Agenda - Dave Sauer, City Engineer is required to attend a meeting in Broadhead and requested we cover the CMAR report, Badger Drive bids, bridge over Allen creek, and bowling alley encroachment all before 7 p.m. These items were moved up in the agenda.
Citizen appearances - NA
Main Street Reconstruction
Discussion and possible motion to approve City Bike Path locations

Bike Trails are a critical part of the DOT grant application. Presently, there are no bike trail routes through the City. Local trails are needed to complement the sidewalk system and provide additional choices for pedestrians, cyclists and outdoor enthusiasts. Ideally, trails would traverse the City to link together residential areas, parks and recreation facilities, schools, and the downtown.

Reviewed & fine-tuned the current City Street Bicycle plan.

City Street Bicycle plan unanimously approved on a Juergens-Sornson motion.
Update of Paving Bricks in Main Street Reconstruction in 2007

Jeff Farnsworth is investigating applying for a department of Commerce Community Development block grant. He will ask the residents to fill out a questionnaire.

Bench & Trash Receptacles

Mayor Decker discussed fabricating benches & trash receptacles with Baker manufacturing. Bruce Woods will work with Baker Mfg. on design.

Bike Rack
Jeff Farnsworth submitted a “windmill” bike hitch design with a Baker Mfg. medallion.

Lake Leota Restoration
Working on Kiosk in the park.

Communications from City Engineer
Approve bids for the "west side park grading project, contract 06EV-4". Project was bid on 7/13/06. The parks committee is making recommendation to public works at their 7/17/06 mtg.

The budget for grading was set at $70,000. This is only enough to grade 4 acres for the 2 Soccer fields.

Discussed on Westside park capitol budget plan. Recommend the following projects be added to the 2007 capitol plan: road & parking lot construction, complete landscaping & Playground.

R&K and Sons bid of $48,175 for grading 2 Soccer Fields in west side park, contract 06EV-4 unanimously approved on a Hammann- Juergens motion.
Approve bids for the "city hall roof replacement and exterior upgrades, contract 06EV-2". The project is bidding on 7/18/06.

The budget for city hall roof replacement and exterior upgrades was set at $207,000. The construction will take 8 weeks and has been approved by historic preservation.

Krause Konstruction Co. bid of $139,330 for city hall roof replacement and exterior upgrades, contract 06EV-2 unanimously approved on a Hammann-Juergens motion.
Communications of Public Works Director
Park & Recreation Board recommended that Public Works discontinue the practice of stockpiling leaves and brush behind the Seminary Apartments. The public works director said this location is near the center of the older section of Evansville, expediting the fall leaf pick up process. After completion of leaf pick up in late fall, the leaves are transferred to farm field to use as fertilizer. This practice has been in place for 10 years.

Discussed alternatives to stockpiling leaves and brush behind the Seminary Apartments. The Public Works director suggested stockpiling the leaves at the following locations: Leota Park, Wind Prairie Park, city dump and new public works garage.

Ald. Sornson suggested continuing the practice stockpiling leaves and brush behind the Seminary Apartments as the lowest cost option.

Direct Public Works director to use the asphalt area near the new Public Works garage for stockpiling leaves and brush unanimously approved on a Hammann-Juergens motion.
Current Public Works projects include:

Carpeting the former Farnsworth Ceramic Shop for youth community center.
Sign Replacing
Completed new bathrooms in Leota Park.
Mowing at cemetery & city parks.
Cutting down & removing storm damaged trees.
Street sweeping.
Brush pickup 1st week of each month.
Discussion on potential plans for the use of Seminary park.

Water Street will be paving from Exchange to Main St. in August.

Publics Works director discussed a mutual aid agreement in case of natural disaster with 30 communities including Janesville, Beloit, & Rock County.

2007 Public Works Operating Budget
Recommend the following changes in the operating budget:

Increase traffic control budget to account for maintenance of new traffic light on Hwy. 14 & county road M intersection.
Add another seasonal employee for park maintenance.
Request information on the following items:

Extending Onyx trash removal contract.
Public benefit for water softener replacement.
Examine Sewer fees.
Request reviewing WWTP account balance.
Unfinished Business
Ordinance #2006-__, amending Municipal Code relative to speed limits
Remove from table Ordinance #2006-__, amending Municipal Code relative to speed limits unanimously approved on a Hammann-Juergens motion.
Discussed reducing speed limit on county road M to 35 MPH within city limits.

Ald. Hammann’s motion for Ordinance #2006-__, amending Municipal Code relative to speed limits failed for lack of second.
New Business
Discussion and possible motion to approve 4-way stop sign at Badger & Higgins Drive intersection

Discussed temporary squaring off interection as a passive speed control measure.

Recommend to Public Safety an Ordinance amending stop sign locations to include 4-way stop sign at Badger & Higgins Drive intersection unanimously approved on a Hammann-Sornson motion.
Meeting adjourned @ 9:27 p.m. on a Hammann-Juergens motion
Next Meeting: Monday, August 28 at 6:00 p.m.

Bill Hammann Chair, Public Works Committee

The "Vlog"----Audio is here; Video is Coming; Stay tuned

If you click on the link, you will get the blog of Prof. Ann Althouse. She is a prolific blogger, and podcaster and has set the pace for blogs locally. If you scroll down her blog to the entry "Vlog" and click on the video icon, you can listen and see her video post.

Now that folks in Evansville have become accustomed to hearing their favorite politicians and school board representatives and even seniors reflecting on the days of yore in Evansville on the Evansville Observer----- soon they will be able to SEE them too.

I want to reassure folks that I will not be in front of the camera but behind it---- but our local politicos will be featured.

Just think. To see and hear what is happening and then be able to treasure the words and the video FOREVER. Wow.

Fontana to discuss changes to referendum limit

At what dollar amount of a proposal should the public be allowed to have a referendum to approve the project or not? In Fontana, there is a proposal to raise the limit to 3 million. That would pretty much gut the whole purpose of the referendum law.

Click on the post for the curent debate in Fontana as described in the Janesville Gazette.

Gazette Corner: International Mercury Conference Begins Today--Evansville Students, Parents Involved

Click on the post for the story by Gina Duwe on the International Mercury Conference that begins today in Madison at Monona Terrace.

Local students from Theodore Robinson Intermediate school were involved in an art project for this conference.

Russ Feingold will be speaking today, and I hope to have the text of his speech available soon.

If you are saying, "Why mercury?"---you need to follow this story. There is the chemistry.....and the politics. The chemistry is very advanced. The politics is back in the dark ages. Stay tuned for all the details over the coming week.

Meanwhile, click on the post for Gina Duwe's story and the parents and kids from Evansville that are involved.

"Grumps" weighs in on Questions and Answers on Smart Growth Plan Amendement Proposal Vote August 8th

Click on the post for some key questions and answers on the proposal slated for public hearing on Tuesday, August 8th at 6:30pm at City Hall. Be there.

Saturday, August 05, 2006

Mayor Dave promises tough response to rising crime rate in Madison

Robberies have doubled in pace in the first six months of 2006 in Madison, and Mayor Dave has promised a strong response. Click on the post for the article covering this in the Wisconsin State Journal.

Gazette Corner: Evansville Citizens will have say on Tuesday----

Click on the post for the article by Gina Duwe that explains the important decision slated for Evansville Common Council on Tuesday, Aug. 8th and how Evanville residents will have an opportunity to voice their opinion.

Friday, August 04, 2006

Agenda: Park Board: Note DATE Change: 8-22-2006

Evansville City Hall Council Chambers

Tuesday, August 22, 2006, 6:00 PM

FINAL AGENDA; Note Date Change!

1. Call to Order & Roll Call.

2. Minutes of July 2006 meeting: Motion to Approve.

3. Possible Changes to Agenda: Motion to Approve if necessary.

4. Citizen appearances other than agenda items.

5. Development of a “2006 Park & Outdoor Recreation Plan”

a. Review of the “1999 Park & Outdoor Recreation Plan”, especially Chapter 4: “Goals and Objectives” and Chapter 5: “The Plan”. (This is the most recent comprehensive plan.)

b. Discussion among PRB members and City Planner Tim Schwecke of a process for development of a new 5-year plan.

c. Public Hearing on the Question: “What are the strengths & weaknesses of Evansville’s park facilities and current park programs?”

d. Discussion and possible motion to approve a schedule for completing a new “2006 Park & Outdoor Recreation Plan” by the end of 2006.

6. Chair’s report on actions of Public Works Committee, Finance & Labor Relations Committee, and Common Council on items of interest to PRB

7. Reports and Updates on Current Park Projects.

a. Lake Leota Park

b. Franklin Park

c. Countryside Park

d. West Side Park

8. Aquatic Report: Pool Director Rick Hamacher

9. Park Maintenance and Improvements Report: Park Maintenance Supervisor Ray Anderson.

10. Old Business

a. “Ownership” of parks by PRB Members

b. .Discussion of Community Service Work program and possible motion for PRB to participate.

11. New Business

a. Preliminary Discussion on uses for Seminary Park

12. Motion to Adjourn.

Classic Audioblogger: The Power of "NO"; or How to Sculpt a David

this is an audio post - click to play

Thursday, August 03, 2006

Editorial Corner: "Common Law"

"We the People are the rightful master of both congress and the courts - not to overthrow the Constitution, but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution." Abraham Lincoln


One of the big concepts of American History is the transition of American Law via England from a land of Kings to the land of common law, where all men had rights to property, and other freedoms, regardless of the priviledge of birth. If you search on Yahoo under "Common Law" the quotation from Abraham Lincoln is one of the first things you come upon. If you visit Springfield and step back in time with Abraham Lincoln, you can sense how important bringing law to the common man was to Abe. It was very real then...travelling the circuit and sleeping in coach houses like ours in Evanville.

The notion that all men should be treated equally before the law is the first building block of American democracy. Yet, this building block is not to be taken for granted, but must be fought for every step of the way. At the very beginning of American history, women and slaves were not considered persons, but rather property. That was changed.

In a world of laws, a citizen can come before his/her government and inquire about the status of the law and be given a uniform response, not a special ordinance legislated because of whom one knows.

So-----

I was pleased the other night when the Evansville Planning Commission discussed uniform processes for evaluation of "impact" on the taxpayer from proposed annexation. The Planning Commission also discussed making a draft of an ordinance that would establish the requirement that a "traffic impact analysis" be done BEFORE and not AFTER a development proposal is approved. These are two items that the taxpayers have been requesting for a long time.

The Planning Commission also began discussion with a lighting ordinance specialist that would establish an ordinance that would regulate light in the city, especially in the commercial and downtown area. This arose out of the Big box ordinance development, which the Observer had the pleasure of sitting in on.

Some see the uniform administration of laws as a threat. Yes. Uniform administration of law is a threat to those who rely on special ordinances to circumvent normal rules. Regular citizens appreciate laws being enforced in a uniform manner.

That's how I see it.

"Grumps" has a "Modest Proposal"

Click on the post for the latest form "Grumps."

Wednesday, August 02, 2006

Criminal Prosecution was considered in 911 Deception

Click on the post for the full story. Enjoy.

School Beat: 4K: Current Observer Poll Status;

(Ed. note. This poll is ongoing. You may only vote once. Encourage others to vote. Every vote counts. )


Would you support raising taxes to support adding 4 Year Old Kindergarten in Evansville Schools?

Answers Votes Percent
1. Yes 2 4%
2. No 55 96%

Minutes: Plan Commission: August 1, 2006

Print - Close Window

Plan Commission

Regular Meeting

Tuesday, August 1, 2006, 6:00 P.M.

City Hall, 31 S. Madison Street, Evansville, WI

MINUTES
The meeting was called to order by Mayor Decker at 6:00 PM. Present were: Mayor Decker, Ald. Braunschweig, Ald. Hammann, Cheryl Dickert, Dave Sauer, Gil Skinner, and Jeff Vrstal Staff present: Tim Schwecke, City Planner and Jim Beilke, Clerk/Treasurer.

Approval of Agenda

Agenda item 7(F) Ordinance #2006-25 was removed and rescheduled for the September agenda. The amended agenda was approved.

Approval of Minutes

Motion by Hammann, seconded by Braunschweig, to waive the reading of the June 29, 2006, minutes and approve them as printed. Motion passed.

Citizen Appearances Other Than Those Agenda Items Listed - None

Unfinished Business.

Mr. Sauer gave an update on traffic impact analysis of Highway 14, County M and J. Lindemann intersections. He reported that Foth & Van Dyke gave their traffic impact analysis of Highway 14, County M, and J. Lindemann intersections to the Department of Transportation (DOT). Foth & Van Dyke should receive approval by next month.

Mayor Decker led the discussion regarding the establishment of a standing committee on Intergovernmental Cooperation, composed of three specified Union Township representatives and three specified City of Evansville representatives. Council approved the committee in July and is waiting for the Town of Union to approve the committee. When they do, Council will elect members for this committee.

Mr. Schwecke led the discussion regarding cost-benefit studies (fiscal impact analysis). The fiscal impact analysis can be done in two ways: (1) how a residential subdivision would impact the tax levy or (2) what is the break-even point of building a home, where the city benefits and costs are even. The first analysis would detail the costs and benefits for new subdivisions, and the second would give a snap shot in time of the costs and benefits for a new home. Karen Aikman, 126 Garfield Ave., reported the city has a software program (from the University of Wisconsin – Madison) to do this fiscal impact analysis and would be willing to assist staff. The Commission instructed staff to review this software with Ms. Aikman and report back at their next regular meeting.

Mr. Schwecke led the discussion of draft ordinance amending the city’s zoning code (Chapter 130) relating to completion of a traffic impact analysis for development projects exceeding a specified threshold. Mr. Sauer reported that municipalities are all over the board on threshold for traffic impact analysis. The Commission discussed what would be an appropriate threshold for the City of Evansville. Because this issue is difficult to understand in terms of real developments and businesses, the Commission instructed staff to provide traffic impact analysis for existing developments and businesses. They instructed staff to use the following existing developments - Cap Stone Ridge, Westfield Meadows, and Grand Orchard with the following businesses - Piggly Wiggly, Ace Hardware, and a bowling alley.

The Commission discussed the draft ordinance amending the city’s subdivision and land division regulations (Chapter 110) relating to completion of a traffic impact analysis for development projects exceeding a specified threshold. The Commission instructed staff to include Chapter 110 in the above analysis.

New Business.

Doug Paulin of Lighting Forensics gave a presentation to the Commission regarding services for preparation of an outdoor lighting ordinance. His services include helping municipalities understand the basics of lighting, what they want to look like at night, latest technology and products available, various lighting issues, techniques to use with lighting issues. The Commission agreed a lighting ordinance was important and would be difficult to write, but they need to address the number one issue from the Large Scale Commercial Development Study Committee, which was commercial-retail lighting. Mr. Paulin’s letter stated his bid was for only the downtown commercial-retail area.

Motion by Hammann, seconded by Braunschweig, to authorize staff to solicit from Mr. Paulin a more definitive bid on his scope of services for writing a lighting ordinance for commercial-retail, electronic signs, and bill boards with residential as a break-out bid.

Mr. Schwecke led the discussion regarding the Preliminary land division, City of Evansville applicant (Application #2006-24). The City has been in negotiations with Adevco, LLC, to exchange real estate. To complete the exchange, the subject property off of Exchange Street needs to be divided.

Mayor Decker opened the public hearing at 7:42 PM. Richard Woulfe, 255 E. Main St., asked the zoning of lot 1. Mr. Schwecke reported it is zoned industrial. Mayor Decker closed the public hearing at 7:43 PM.

Motion by Hammann, seconded by Sauer, to recommend to the Common Council the approval of the division of the subject property into the lots as shown on the preliminary CSM, based on a finding that the land division is environmentally sound and there are adequate public facilities available to meet the needs of the land division, provided the conditions listed in the staff report (and other conditions as may be imposed by the Commission) are met prior to recording the final CSM with Rock County. Motion passed.

Mark Steiner led the discussion regarding the preliminary land division, Mark Steiner and Davis Pryce applicant (Application #2006-25). He asked to divide the subject property off of Brown School Road.

Mayor Decker opened the public hearing at 7:53 PM. Ald. Juergens asked the Commission to list the benefits for the city for dividing this lot. The Commission reported it would increased the assessment roll, infill property, and be better land use. Mayor Decker closed the public hearing at 7:57 PM.

Motion by Hammann, seconded by Braunschweig, to recommend to the Common Council the approval of the division of the subject property into the lots as shown on the preliminary CSM, based on a finding that the land division is environmentally sound and there are adequate public facilities available to meet the needs of the land division, provided the conditions listed in the staff report (and other conditions as may be imposed by the Commission) are met prior to recording the final CSM with Rock County. Motion passed.

Mr. Schwecke led the discussion regarding the preliminary land division, Rolland and Diane Probst applicant (Application #2006-26). The applicants are asking to divide the subject property off of West Main Street.

Mayor Decker opened the public hearing at 8:01 PM. Ald. Cothard is opposed to the applicant’s right to build a duplex on these proposed lots. He reported the Commission from previous years would not allow duplexes to be built on West Main Street. The subject property is zoned R-2, and if the lot is divided, the applicants could build two duplexes on Main Street. Finally, he asked if the Commission considered the fact that the city’s sewer line runs through the proposed lot 1. Mr. Schwecke reported the zoning map listed the subject property as R-2 and the sewer line was not discussed. Ald. Mayor Decker closed the public hearing at 8:14 PM.

The Commission questioned if they have all the facts to make this decision and if the public benefits outweigh the public costs.

Motion by Hammann, seconded by Vrstal, to recommend to the Common Council the approval of the division of the subject property into the lots as shown on the preliminary CSM, based on a finding that the land division is environmentally sound and there are adequate public facilities available to meet the needs of the land division, provided the conditions listed in the staff report (and other conditions as may be imposed by the Commission) are met prior to recording the final CSM with Rock County. Motion failed. All Commissioners voted against.

Ald. Hammann led the discussion regarding the City-initiated comprehensive plan amendment, (Application #2006-27). He reported the future transportation map shows two things: (1) streets and their classifications that are existing today and (2) streets and their classifications that will exist in the future. This resolution would change the future transportation map as follows: J. Lindemann Drive would be listed as a major collector, Brown School Road would be listed as a minor collector, Water Street would be listed as a truck route, Exchange Street would be listed as a truck route, Porter Road would be listed as a minor collector from 5th Street to city limits, and Main Street would be listed as a minor collector from 4th Street to city limits. Finally, Ald. Hammann noted that the resolution did not list Cemetery Road as a future minor collector, which was an oversight.

The Commission grappled with the idea that many existing homes on Main Street would need to put in sidewalks, which means that current homeowners would be required to add and pay for sidewalks. When the homes were built, the sidewalks were not required. This resolution would require sidewalks on Main Street. The Commission discussed alternative special assessments for the sidewalks on Main Street and decided to let Council explore that issue when the time arises.

Motion by Hammann, seconded by Sauer, to adopt Plan Commission resolution #2006-9 recommending the City Council revise the future transportation map with the amendment to include Cemetery Road as a future minor collector. On a roll call vote, the motion passed. Mayor Decker, Ald. Hammann, Dickert, Sauer, Skinner, and Vrstal voted in favor. Ald. Braunschweig voted against.

Mr. Schwecke led the discussion regarding the sign code text amendment to provide for the regulation of window signs. He reported that this agenda item was on the June 29, 2006 agenda, but the Commission postponed the public hearing and action to the August meeting to allow for a redrafting of the ordinance.

Mayor Decker opened the public hearing at 8:48 PM and closed it at 8:49 PM.

Motion by Hammann, seconded by Braunschweig, to recommend to Council the adoption of Ordinance #2006-16 as redrafted. Motion passed.

Mr. Schwecke led the discussion relating to amending the city’s zoning code (Chapter 130) to allow the city planner to review and act on minor site plan amendments. The city’s zoning code gives the Plan Commission the responsibility of reviewing site plans and amendment to site plan amendments. In instances where amendments would fall into a category of “not a big deal,” it may be appropriate to allow the city planner to approve minor modifications to a previously approved site plan. The difficulty is drawing the line in the sand between small changes and big changes. If an ordinance were approved, the city planner would document the minor modification he approved and submit it to the Plan Commission at its next regular meeting. The Commission debated this control issue. The city planner is a consultant, and consultants change. If the city planner were any employee of the city, they tend to be a more permanent staff. The Commission has a lot of confidence in Mr. Schwecke’s ability and judgment, but they are very concerned about the future in terms of city planner and defining what is a minor modification.

On a roll call vote, motion passed. Mayor Decker, Ald. Hammann, Sauer, and Skinner voted in favor. Ald. Braunschweig, Dickert, and Vrstal voted against.

Mr. Schwecke led the discussion relating to how the current zoning code allows land uses that are not listed in the zoning code (Section 130-301). Land uses that are not listed are not necessarily excluded from locating within any given zoning district. Mr. Schwecke recommended this provision be amended to state the opposite – if a land use is not listed, or cannot be interpreted to be like a listed use, it is prohibited. Ald. Braunschweig and Ald. Hammann would be sponsor for this ordinance.

Motion by Braunschweig, seconded by Hammann, instructing staff to draft an ordinance amending the Municipal Code relative to land uses in Section 130-301. Motion passed.

Preliminary Development Presentations - None

Report of the Evansville Redevelopment Authority - None

Report of the Evansville Historic Preservation Commission – None

City Planner’s Report

Mr. Schwecke gave an update on Council actions relating to Plan Commission, Tom Nonn, d/b/a Badger Cycle, and the number of development applications submitted to date compared to 2005.

Adjournment

Motion by Hammann, seconded Braunschweig, to adjourn at 9:22 PM, carried.

Prepared by:

James A. Beilke

City Clerk/Treasurer

The minutes are not official until approved by Plan Commission at the next regular meeting.

Gazette Corner: LaCrosse might be the model for Alternative Treatment

Click on the post for the latest on the alternative treatment discussion. LaCrosse may be the model for Rock County? Stay tuned.

Mayor Decker: "It is a fine line that we walk"

(Ed.note. This audio is from the Mayoral Debate of March 2006. The quality is poor. Please use headphones and adjust for tone. Mayor Decker notes that there has been consultation with the school and that poor planning by the city could have disasterous consequences for the taxpayer.

Her final words are: "It is a fine line that we walk."

this is an audio post - click to play

Evansville Planning Commission: Discusses fiscal impact analysis of new annexations; and More.

It was June 15, 2005 that the famous speech "Planning's Other Half" was delivered

  Posted by Picasaby Doug Zewizig at Evansville City Hall at the conclusion of the Evansville Smart Growth Plan. In that speech he spoke of the necessity of analyzing the impact of planning decisions before and not after action is taken.

On Monday night, there was another segment of the discussion about how the city could address this. Click on the audio icon below for the opening remarks of the City Planner as he discusses what the objective of the analysis would be.

The city does have some financial analysis software that may help them in this matter and some felt that would be the best way to go. On the other hand, the city staff has had this software for many months and nothing has happened. Possibly an outside consultant would be more objective and be able to deliver the product desired in a timely manner.

After all. Nothing is going to be annexed or upgraded till the analysis is done. As Mayor Decker stated in her speech at the Mayoral debate in March of 2006, the consequences for poorly considered decisions could be disasterous for the taxpayers.


this is an audio post - click to play

Back to the Future--1960---a true story

In 1960 the beloved school superintendent of Mahtomedi died. It was a real shock. He had been there almost thirty years. Everyone in town thought of him as a father figure. I dimly understood what the big deal was. I was 15.

Then the new superintendent arrived. About 40'ish. His first actions were a little controversial. The older secretary that everyone knew and loved was fired. In her place came a young blond, beautiful adminstrative assistant. Even though she did not know shorthand, she had a lot of nice qualities. I thought she was just fine. Did I say she was beautiful? O.K.

John Kennedy had just taken office and there was a burst of fresh optimism everywhere. My dad got so enthusiastic he even bought a new car--a very unusual thing for him to do. Had to get the economy moving again. Anyway.

At one of the first Mahtomedi School Board meetings of the new superintendent, he made a bold annoucement. He showed the school board a graph of live births from 1940 to 1960 and announced that there was a crisis of epic proportions right here in our small town. We had to take action immediately. At the current rate of live births, we would be needing one new school immediately and possibly another in five years.

He went on to explain that the data was firm. There was no need for outside consultants. Why hire a man to read your watch when he might just tell you the time and then steal the watch. We could do the job right here in Mahtomedi. It was real clear.

So they built BIG.

Sometime after the christening of the new school, a new report came out. It seems that a new development had occured. It was called "birth control." That one small detail had changed everything.

Now Mahtomedi had a chance to lead. It went to the very top, TOP of the list of highest taxed municipalities in Minnesota-----and remained at the top for 20 years at least.

The new superintendent was discredited. Everyone in town said, "Surely he could have done an "impact study" and learned that his data was flawed for the future."

So---as a very young man I learned about two very powerful things----birth control and impact studies. Make a note of it.

this is an audio post - click to play

Evansville Planning Commisison: Amends Future Transportation Map; Affects West Main

The Evansville Planning Commission on Monday night voted to designate the following
  Posted by Picasa
streets under the Transportation Plan:

A. J. Lindemann--major collector (currently local)
B. Brown School Road--minor collector
C. Water Street--truck route
D. Exchange Street--truck route
E. Porter road: minor collector from 5th street to city limits
F. Main Street--minor collector from 4th street to city limits
G. Cemetary Road--- Future Collector

Mason Braunschweig indicated he was uncomfortable with making the Main street collector designation which would require some sidewalks installed at homeowner expense, when these homeowners might not have realized the impact of this action if they had seen notice of it at the Library.

There was considerable discussion about the fact that this should have been done in the initial planning, but in the final analysis, there has to be an east-west collector.

Planning Commission: Approves lot divison for commerical adjacent to Evansville Oil Pros

At last night's Evansville Planning Commission, members gave their blessing to the
  Posted by Picasa
preliminary land division application #2006-25 submitted by Mark Steiner and Davis Pryce.

Mark Steiner indicated that the lot, which is currently just a bunch of thistles, will be the home of a commerical enterprise, separate from Evansville Oil Pros, and will be constructed in a log design. He gave no further details, but said he would be bringing his plans and specifics back before planning later.

Evansville Has a Full Plate

At last month's Evansville School Board Meeting, Chris Eager made a presentation about where the task force on the Senior Center was at.

He paused in the presentation and reflected that we in Evansville have a lot going on. ...."The Senior Center....then others chimed in...The New Library....The Fire Station.....the new paving brick project....The New Economy Story....and a review of the School...The new Public Works garage.....The new City Hall roof....."

Then there was a moment of silence.

Then Chris went on...."And...The resources are not unlimited."

Then another moment of silence.

It is pretty stunning to realize how expansive the dreams of our city are. After the garage sale on Saturday, it will begin. The intersection at Madison and Main will be worked on.

I have read the history of Mrs. Montgomery of Evansville. I wonder if at any time in its history this city has had as many projects on the table at once.

I remember running a marathon once and I asked a fellow runner where the 5 mile marker was. He replied: "If you're looking at the markers now, you won't finish the race. It's a long race." He was right. 20 miles was it for me.

My point is: This is going to be a long race. Let's stay loose. Work together. And yes, when it has passed, maybe if the heat index is lower, we can party on. Maybe the Blooze Brothers can come again with all three of the female parole officers this time. And they can sing "Soul Man" one more time. It's just too hot for "Soul Man" right now. It will be best in cooler weather.

"Grumps" has a question

Click on the post for a question by Grumps.

Tuesday, August 01, 2006

The Sermon

On of the traditions in our family back in the 50's was the tradition of the after church quizz. As a means of making sure my sister, Susie and I were paying attention at Church, we were asked questions about it on the way home in the car. Soon we made game of it. We were a bit competitive I guess. We tried to outdo each other as to the finer points of the sermon.

Then Fr. Jackson came to the parish. He fashioned himself an orator of sorts. He was very, very organized. Each sermon was organized in outline. You might wonder how I know. Well. He shared the outline with the parish so we could follow along with the supreme logic of the sermon.

I still remember--it's been 50 years or so---- to this day his sermon "On Love." Once the title was out of his lips, I winked to my sister that this is one we needed to pay attention to. As any inquisitive teen, I was alert for any new information. I was all ears.

Then Fr. Jackson began his sermon. His first section, or "A" was on the general properties of 'Love." Points, 1,2,3. Then "How" God loves us was section "B" and then, logically, "C" covered the "Why" God loves us. Needless to say, there was no new information. It seemed that God had a pretty tightly organized love process.

Anyway, I still remember the ride home from Church. It was pretty quiet. Very quiet. In fact---- too quiet. So...I thought I would open with the first question......."Well..Susie, what did you think of point B2?"

Then both Susie and I burst out in uncontrollable laughter.

Then Mom interjected, "Now kids, that's just enough,.....enough. "

That was the end of the analysis.

I guess that Fr. Jackson was the winner over all the years though. We did remember each and every one of the points. It's just that we never did find love to be as organized as life unfolded. Alleluia.

this is an audio post - click to play

Monday, July 31, 2006

4K: Financial Analysis: Melissa Hammann Speaks

(click on the sudioblogger for the remarks of Melissa Hammann at the July Evansville School Board meeting--she provides the financial analysis of the proposed 4k for Evansville.)

this is an audio post - click to play

this is an audio post - click to play

"Fred" reminds us of Park Board Public Hearing on Aug 21st. Mark the calendars

The five year plan for the Park Board is being updated and "Fred" has the details on the public hearing on August 21st. Mark the calendars. Plan on attending.

Classic Audioblogger: "That Vision Thang"

this is an audio post - click to play

Classic Audioblogger: Dateline: Lake Leota---Last Duck Heads South

this is an audio post - click to play

"True Love,"; or, Where is " Miracle Max" when we need him?

(Ed. note. Due to the many requests of readers, I have reprinted this post of 7-13-2006. Enjoy. )

Many of you remember the blogger "Miracle Max" who posted for many days here on the Observer site. It sure would be nice to get his advice during this period in our local history---here is the question.

First a little background. In the movie "Princess Bride", after Wesley and the princess get out of the forest and the pit of despair, Wesley is apparently killed and he is dragged to the house of "Miracle Max."

"Miracle Max" is not too happy to come out of retirement to treat Wesley. He performs a preliminary test and asks Wesley...."What do you seek?" Wesley says something. Miracle Max says that Wesley has said "Tru Blave"----that he just wants to be brave which is not a strong enough reason to save him.

The wife of Miracle Max then strongly speaks up and says that Wesley has instead said "True Love." And she insists that this is a noble calling worth saving his life for.

Well. The rest of the movie is pretty clear cut.

Here is my question. Was this just a hearing problem with Miracle Max? or something deeper. I have always wondered.

Recently on our local scene, 95% of the folks in Evansville have said that they want a growth rate of 27% or less. Some say that they cannot hear this. I am the Observer and would give anyone a chance. A benefit of the doubt.

This may just be a hearing problem.

You make the call.

Dateline Rome: Weekend Update: View of the City--fiction

(Ed. note. Due to the many folks who have requested republishing of this famous dateline story from July 16, I have republished it without comment. Enjoy. )

As my readers remember,The Observer is covering the secret conclave being held in the deepest bowels of Rome that will consider the delicate task of reviewing whether after centuries of discussion, the World is still "flat" as was declared in an infallible dictum by high, in fact very high authorities.......or whether it is just "mostly flat." The effect of this nuanced decision could be momentous and shake the faith of even the most devoted brethern. So....listen up..

I have been hiding in the lower catacombs of the Villa Roma, just off the Apian Way. Please keep this confidential since there could be dire consequences. I am just below the vast villa of Nuncio and Pricilla and have been startled by the loud sounds coming from their quarters. I need my sleep, and their noise has been very loud......The fighting that is.

It seems that Nuncio is a traveling salesman type and Pricilla has been home in the heat of the summer. With no air conditioning. For those of you who have been to Rome, you know how hot it gets. Anyway, Pricilla, or more tersly, "Silla" which is "Silli" in Italian, decided during a recent trip of Nuncio, that she needed more "connectivity." She was getting very bored. A local restauranteur caught her eye. Nuncio found out about it.

The Observer heard about this just from the loud noise. I heard Nuncio talking about the vows they had made, the promises, the plan.......I heard Silli talking about the need for "connectivity" and that she wanted to increase population and reduce traffic flow.

Nuncio was totally bewildered. I could tell he was losing the argument because he started talking about religion. He talked about "trust." She talked about the
Song of Solomon. It went on and on. For every quotation about fidelity, she had one from the Song of Solomon. She must have been reading that song a lot.

Finally, he was desperately searching for the Italian word for committment. Or faithfullness. .....

I did not have the heart to listen to the rest of the argument. I knew how the argument would end.

As my dear readers know,.....there is no such word ..... It's just all "amore."

I will be standing by at Villa Roma, waiting to hear the word on whether the world is "flat" or just "mostly flat" and I pledge to let you all know just as soon as possible. It is hot, ....very hot here and it reminds me of the movie "Good Morning Vietnam." Wish me luck. And please keep my location secret.

Classic Audioblogger: I see the Light; Or Out of the Darkness I have arisen Commercial

this is an audio post - click to play

Classic Audioblogger: Let's Keep Everything Just the Way it Was

this is an audio post - click to play

Agenda: Evansville Planning Commission: August 1, 2006; 6PM

Evansville Plan Commission
  Posted by Picasa
Regular Meeting

Tuesday, August 1, 2006, 6:00 p.m.

City Hall, 31 S. Madison Street, Evansville, WI

AGENDA
Call to order
Roll call
Approval of agenda
Approval of minutes

Motion to waive the reading of the June 29, 2006 minutes and approve them as printed
Citizen appearances other than agenda items listed
Unfinished business
Update on traffic impact analysis of Highway 14, County M and J. Lindemann intersections

Discussion regarding the establishment of a standing committee on Intergovernmental Cooperation, composed of three specified Union Township representatives and three specified City of Evansville representatives
Discussion regarding cost-benefit studies (fiscal impact analysis)

Discussion of draft ordinance amending the city’s zoning code (Chapter 130) relating to completion of a traffic impact analysis for development projects exceeding a specified threshold
Discussion of draft ordinance amending the city’s subdivision and land division regulations (Chapter 110) relating to completion of a traffic impact analysis for development projects exceeding a specified threshold


New business
Presentation by Doug Paulin of Lighting Forensics regarding professional services for preparation of an outdoor lighting ordinance

Preliminary land division, City of Evansville applicant (Application #2006-24)
Initial presentation by applicant
Staff report, if any
Initial discussion by Plan Commission
Public hearing
Final discussion by Plan Commission
Closing comments by applicant
Motion to recommend to the Common Council the approval of the division of the subject property into the lots as shown on the preliminary CSM, based on a finding that the land division is environmentally sound and there are adequate public facilities available to meet the needs of the land division, provided the conditions listed in the staff report (and other conditions as may be imposed by the Commission) are met prior to recording the final CSM with Rock County.
Preliminary land division, Mark Steiner and Davis Pryce applicant (Application #2006-25)

Initial presentation by applicant
Staff report, if any
Initial discussion by Plan Commission
Public hearing
Final discussion by Plan Commission
Closing comments by applicant
Motion to recommend to the Common Council the approval of the division of the subject property into the lots as shown on the preliminary CSM, based on a finding that the land division is environmentally sound and there are adequate public facilities available to meet the needs of the land division, provided the conditions listed in the staff report (and other conditions as may be imposed by the Commission) are met prior to recording the final CSM with Rock County.

Preliminary land division, Rolland and Diane Probst applicant (Application #2006-26)
Initial presentation by applicant
Staff report, if any
Initial discussion by Plan Commission
Public hearing
Final discussion by Plan Commission
Closing comments by applicant

Motion to recommend to the Common Council the approval of the division of the subject property into the lots as shown on the preliminary CSM, based on a finding that the land division is environmentally sound and there are adequate public facilities available to meet the needs of the land division, provided the conditions listed in the staff report (and other conditions as may be imposed by the Commission) are met prior to recording the final CSM with Rock County.

City-initiated comprehensive plan amendment, (Application #2006-27)
Initial presentation
Staff report, if any
Discussion by Plan Commission
Motion to adopt Plan Commission resolution #2006-9 recommending the City Council revise the future transportation map (Note: Consistent with state law, at least four affirmative votes are needed for passage.)
Zoning code text amendment relating to large-format retail stores
Presentation by staff
Initial discussion by Plan Commission
Public hearing
Final discussion by Plan Commission
Motion to recommend to Council the adoption of Ordinance #2006-25 as drafted
Sign code text amendment to provide for the regulation of window signs (Note: This agenda item was on the June 29, 2006 agenda, but the commission postponed the public hearing and action to the August meeting to allow for a redrafting of the ordinance.)
Presentation by staff
Initial discussion by Plan Commission
Public hearing
Final discussion by Plan Commission
Motion to recommend to Council the adoption of Ordinance #2006-16 as redrafted
Discussion relating to amending the city’s zoning code (Chapter 130) to allow the city planner to review and act on minor site plan amendments
Discussion relating to how the current zoning code allows land uses that are not listed in the zoning code (Section 130-301).
Preliminary development presentations
None
Report of the Evansville Redevelopment Authority – none
Report of the Evansville Historic Preservation Commission – none
City planner’s report
Update on Common Council actions relating to Plan Commission recommendations
Enforcement – Tom Nonn, dba Badger Cycle
Number of development applications submitted to date compared to 2005
Motion to adjourn
Mayor Sandra J. Decker, Plan Commission Chair