Commentary: Observer advises caution: Utility savings may be phantom

In the "budget savings" listed at last night at the Evansville School Board, $60,000 was listed as a budget "saving" from utility or energy costs. The Observer is in consult with proper certified meterological specialists and accounting types as to whether this "saving" is simply a "variation" from previous estimates which were off simply because last year was the warmest winter in 40+ years.

Supr. Carvin did note in passing that the lower energy costs resulted in a lower than expected dip into the savings account. This lower than expected "dip" is not a saving in any way.

Therefore, it is good to pause now that $160,000 has been identified, but it would be better to get a clarification as to whether in fact the budget amount listed for the actual consumption in the coming school year is reasonable given the weather pattens over the past 10 years. Also, it must be considered that the option lock as to BTU therms is only "locked" til January when the option renews. There is a risk there that must be budgeted for.

Mr. Pierick noted that with the cuts that were agreed on, the budget is very tight until further cuts are identified and agreed upon. The last thing the board or the community needs is an unforceen surprise caused by an underestimate of energy expenses. Remember that financial specialists are paid to be on target and not for moving "savings" from one accrual to another. That is just "gaming" the budget process. Big difference.