The Theory of "Love Equity"-----the last of our Constitutional rights

(Ed. note. The Observer has felt remiss that he has been unable to weigh in on the current tabloid speculation regarding Jen and whomever, or even Paris Hilton. It is so hard to do analysis in the checkout line. So, I have offered this short article instead.)

Recently at a local meeting, the word "equity" was used so often that it brought back memories of contract law----yes, there are actions on the contract and then actions on the basis of "equity." It has been a long time. Too bad that "Ambulance" has been silenced. Ah, the good old days when a wild and crazy discussion was possible. But---I digress. The word "equity" brought back memories of a time some thirty years ago when I thought I had driven the stake in the heart of one foolish theory---the theory of "love equity." Maybe you have heard of this theory.

As a young married man, one of my friends who was the first of the guys to get married, was watching Monday night football with me, when he went over the fact that because he had gotten married first.....and since all the younger guys seemed to be reveling in the new morality, that....well...he felt that he had been cheated out of his just due...... his "love equity". It just was not "fair."

The more he discussed his "love inequity," the more he seemed to become agitated. So....I let him talk...and talk...and talk...till the first half of football had ended. The Vikings were winning so I thought I could proceed with some friendly advice.

I then gently asked him whether he thought maybe the stories of his peer group might be exaggerated concerning their exploits or let's just say the large amount of "love equity" that they were experiencing. He said he had never thought of the possibility. I asked him to consider that sometimes guys did exaggerate. The thought shocked him.

Now that I had gotten his attention, I simply asserted that I knew that his wife did love him and that to run around on her would be a foolish mistake. Now that he had two kids, things had changed. Love had matured...hopefully. It was not like the movies.

Thirdly, I mentioned that he might benefit from some counseling----I always thought it prudent to recommend counseling for those who had feelings of "love equity deficit."

Thus, recently I have heard some weird "equity" analysis regarding the 5K controversy-----Is it possible to do a broad based diversity analysis on a sample of 12 vs. a sample of 1200 and reach any conclusion at all? Can folks who give not a wit about tolerance or diversity be suddenly concerned about "inequity." Can folks who sacrifice for their children be spun to be "rich" and not worthy of access to public education that fits their child's educational need?

For me----- It is about choice. I believe parents can make the choice which is best for their child.

For those who believe that the taxpayer should pay for the "level playing field" encompasing every perceived matter than one can be subject to inequity------------I say to them the same thing I told the confused fellow during Monday night football.

Counseling.