Evansville Water: The Movie: Part 1

Audio/Video Evansville Schools Meetings

Seek the High Ground

The Book of Minutes

Search This Blog

Wisconsin Wit

Monday, August 17, 2009

City of Evansville releases budget suggestions presented via email

(Ed.note: Responding to a Freedom of Information request, the City of Evansville has relased the following idea summaries from email ideas submitted to it for budget reduction.)


Emailed Budget Suggestions
Suggestions that have been added since the 7/31/09 update are in italics.

General Suggestions – All Departments:
1. You can’t deplete services to balance a budget, but some areas could reduce expenditures, but then the argument of why us and not them comes to play (of which you may not have a choice in the matter either) and it will be depicted as playing favorites.
2. Everyone getting a paycheck from the city should take a day off. Everyone: the council, the administrator, the judge, all the employees. Whether you make $10 or $50 an hour it will add up and everyone is sharing in it.

Capital Budget:
1. One question that I feel is a big one is, how does the capital budget play into the numbers game of the budget. I could see not starting a project or projects that would cover the shortfall.

Finance:
1. Encourage all elected officials to forego their stipends for the next fiscal year. Those who will not do so should face opposition in coming elections. Our leaders must lead in times of fiscal crisis.
2. Perhaps some consolidation of services could result from closer proximity of PD to the City Hall.
3. Eliminate the City Administrators position. We have a very capable mayor and operated for many years without an administrator. We have in place plenty of qualified board members and councils to over see the Mayor. We have a Finance Director, City Clerk, Deputy Clerk, Human Resource Director and many assistants that run City Hall fine and would do fine w/ just the Mayor over seeing them. They all know city business very well.

Police:
1. Examine very seriously the possibility of cutting staff at the police department -- I've been looking over the "incident reports" in the Review. It appears that there are less than two incidents per hour, and a sizeable fraction of those are assisting people or handling phone messages at 535 E. Main, where the Police Station currently sits. How many people are necessary to handle two incidents per hour? Another sizeable number of incidents are "security checks". Exactly what does this mean -- a cop in a car drives by a place? There have been over 40 in the last two weeks at Antes Drive. Does this mean a cop drives through the park about 3 times a day? Each counts as an "incident"? Maybe I'm way off base, but please look into staff reduction at the PD.
2. Sell the current police station on Main St and move operations to the old fire station as soon as possible. Perhaps some consolidation of services could result from closer proximity of PD to the City Hall.

Public Works:
1. W&L could share equipment with Public Works which would spread out those purchases for DPW equipment to later dates.
2. In the winter if there is no snow what exactly do they do? How come I see hired summer help doing all the work while the full time year around people stand around doing nothing? Lets cut the summer help and require the full time employees to do work. Let's create a work cycle in the winter where some work a second shift to reduce overtime for snow removal on a late afternoon shift.

Parks:
1. Reduce mowing frequency of city parks; this may keep the city from hiring a seasonal worker or two in the PW Department for 2010.
2. Sell the city-owned parkland on S. 4th street (near the college apartments) to a developer.

Cemetery:
1. Council should consider an increase in cemetery fees. The cemetery should not be a drain on finances but should provide income to the city or be sold to a private group.

Water & Light:
1. Water & Light is actually exempt from this process, because they are a revenue based enterprise, not fund based like the city side of the budget.
2. W&L could share equipment with Public Works which would spread out those purchases for DPW equipment to later dates.
3. Council should consider an increase in payment from the water and light utility. The benefits of owning our own utility need to be further explored.
4. Start w/ cuts w/ Water & Light. They have more employees and vehicles then any other city department. They have new buildings and many new pieces of equipment. When there is no building going on in the city why are we building them new buildings and buying them new vehicles? They hire out most of their work. Why am I seeing W&L employees weed whacking and mowing lawn? Do they not have enough of their own work to do? At a typical incident when I drive by I see 4 guys standing around talking while one is actually doing the work. What company has all new equipment and trucks when there is no new building going on? I think they are a vital part of our community I just think we could cut some of the positions to save money.

7 comments:

  1. Anonymous9:21 PM

    I find very little to disagree with in any of these suggestions.
    Especially the one about the Police Department. I think it is treated like a sacred cow with no one offering much of any budgetary criticism, probably out of fear of retaliation. Do they really need to be driving around town in large expensive gas guzzling SUVs and sedans to do their work, or is it just important that they look real cool?

    ReplyDelete
  2. As I posted earlier, cutting Water & Light expenditures will do nothing to balance the city's budget, because Water & Light is a municipal utility with a separate budget.

    Last I checked, the stipends paid to the mayor and council members were a tiny drop in the bucket compared to city budget.

    It is my understanding that when times were still good, the city added a full-time clerical position at City Hall and a full-time position in the Department of Public Works (these positions were added after I ceased to be city administrator, so I could be wrong about this). These are quite reasonable enlargements to staffing given the large increase in the city's population before the collapse of the housing market, but the city might not be able to afford these added positions. The growth in property tax base during the boom years was not enough to cover the added cost of serving all those additional residents over the long haul.

    Bill Connors
    Former Evansville City Administrator

    ReplyDelete
  3. Anonymous8:56 AM

    I don't think the police dept needs to hire anymore officers. I was in there one day and found three (during the day standing around talking to R.C.S.)

    I wonder if their cries of needing more help has more to do with the extra things they are trying to do like the accreditation and moving. Neither of these things should take away , or make them feel as though they need more help and I think it does.

    It's funny in this day when most people are driving their vehicles until the tires fall off, putting off any big purchases, the E.P.D. has that S.U.V.. what was the point is getting that? They don't need that. So the money was in the budget and they wanted to spend it. They can not justify such a expense. I wonder how much they could get for it if it was sold? I am sure plenty as it is always maintained.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Anonymous1:10 PM

    The SUV was purchased primarily for winter driving--which I think was a good idea. Turned out to be real handy last winter.

    I do agree that accredidation should be taken out of the budget. However, the city administrator is insisting on it. Like a lot of things, this is nice, but clearly not necessary at a time when the mayor has said everything is on the table--including furloughs and layoffs.

    Instead of hiring new officers, they should look at re-evaluating shifts/duties. Why is it necessary that both command officers, plus a regular officer, work on third shift? And, even though it brings in some money, why are officers required to do registrations? That takes officers off the street to do work that is basically clerical. And then there are the salvage inspections. Yes, that's money going to the dept., but it takes an officer off the streets.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Anonymous7:16 PM

    Its funny I must have missed the rough, mountain like terrain that would require a suv. They managed many years with out one and don't recall ever hearing they could not go out on a call because of the weather.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Anonymous12:52 PM

    If it matters, the first day that the suv was delivered to the p.d., was one of our bad storms last winter. They had tried to go out with the regular squads, but couldn't stay on the road.

    BTW, in an earlier blog, I refered to command staff and a regular officer all being on THIRD shift; I meant to say FIRST shift.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Anonymous7:06 AM

    I might be incorrect, but I've heard it is not possible to reduce the amount of Police Officers, because that is something regulated by the State's Public Safety Dept.

    Is it possible that municipalities need to have a minimum number of officers based on their population?

    I also wanted to add support to the comment on NOT hiring the seasonal, part-time Cemtery & Parks employees. During busier times (Memorial Day, Labor Day, Veteran's Day and Independence Day to name a few) Parks & Cemetery can get assistance from the Public Works or Water & Light crews.

    Everyone has to pull together and be flexible during these tough times.

    ReplyDelete