The attorney for Mr. Shotliff stated that Supr. Carvin had said that this development would not have an effect on our schools. This was disputed.
MP3 File
The Evansville Observer Archive: The unofficial history of Evansville, Wisconsin from 2005-2013: Thousands of Video and Audio and Articles; Free: To Search scroll to the Search this Blog line and enter name of person, topic, or issue. Then scroll up to see all articles. Or use Google Search by topic. Enjoy.
I sometimes wonder if Heidi Carvin can remember what she told who. OF course its going to impact our schools. There is no way it is not going to . Heidi Carvin is just trying to get them to see her in a good light as she is going to go after them with a ref. I am willing to bet money on it. Those same people would be sittting there going , hello !!! She,Heidi, wants money for a new school and running costs? But she told us it would not effect the schools. What a wake up call they would have.
ReplyDeleteChasin---
ReplyDeleteThere is voluminous video and audio on The Observer of Supr. Carvin warning of our schools nearing capacity--so--
When the attorney made the statement regarding Supr. Carvin saying there would be no impact, numerous folks in the audience murmered the words "neutral"-- I recall her words as being she was "neutral" on the proposal. That is a very different statement from saying there is no impact. One is neutral, since the price of the homes per a developer agreement has not been set, the pace has not been set, and the odds of getting approved are less that 50-50, and the role of a superintendent is not to be an advocate of every development proposal. So---there is an issue of fact of what Supr. Carvin said to this attorney.
I expect that Supr Carvin can weigh in on what she said. In public she has warned. In fact overwarned in some cases which I have detailed.
And yes, chasin, she has also asked for more services such as 4k, and additional overhead. Oh---and 44 million in schools.
Stay tuned.
Richard I am glad you clarified What the situation was in terms of what was actually said. I did not know how she could tell anyone it would not impact schools, when she is begging for a new one due to her idea of ' overcrowding'. Which I have kids in 3/4 schools and I'm there quite often and I don't see the crowding issue. I would like to add a addition to our home because we think we are crowded. Would love for tax payers to pay for it, now that would be nice.
ReplyDelete